国产bbaaaaa片,成年美女黄网站色视频免费,成年黄大片,а天堂中文最新一区二区三区,成人精品视频一区二区三区尤物

首頁(yè)> 外文學(xué)位 >Arguing identity and security: Out-of-area intervention and change in the Atlantic Community.
【24h】

Arguing identity and security: Out-of-area intervention and change in the Atlantic Community.

機(jī)譯：爭(zhēng)論身份和安全：大西洋共同體的區(qū)域外干預(yù)和變化。

獲取原文
獲取原文并翻譯 | 示例
  • 摘要
  • 著錄項(xiàng)
  • 相似文獻(xiàn)
  • 相關(guān)主題

摘要

This dissertation attempts to explain the persistent robustness of the Atlantic Community despite ongoing tensions and crises in the community. Conventional realist theories for explaining change are inadequate for studying the Atlantic Community because they posit that change occurs through hegemonic war, coercion, and bargaining. The Atlantic Community, however, is a transformed anarchy where the security dilemma has been solved. This means that its members solve all of their disputes short of war, and maintain a reflexive sense of the normative value of the community and an interest in preserving the community. The study of the Atlantic (security) Community requires instead a discursive approach focusing on identity and public argument. Drawing on Lene Hansen's method for the study of discourse, I undertake a discourse analysis of public statements made by policy elites about alliance relations and policy. I study the allied debates over out-of-area intervention in Suez in 1956, Vietnam in 1965, Bosnia in the early 1990s and Iraq in 2003, to show how the definitions of out-of-area, threat, and responsibility have changed over time, and undertake a broader cross-time analysis of arguments about the meaning of Atlanticism to show that evidence for the consolidation of the security community can be seen in discourse. I use a three-tiered theoretical framework which focuses on the contextual identity of the Atlantic community and its changing meaning; on the implementation of that identity through arguments about allies' expectations of each other; and on the argumentative processes the allies use to change or preserve their community in times of discord. This framework focuses attention on the useful vagueness of identity, which allows the allies to interpret it in ways that help maintain the community. It also refocuses attention on the importance of agents in the construction of identity by showing how the allies actively bound themselves together through their arguments. I conclude that while the Atlantic Community has seen significant change in discourse, where much of the basis and meaning of Atlanticism has changed, it has not endured a change of discourse, such that it is not recognizable to itself.
機(jī)譯：本文試圖解釋盡管大西洋共同體持續(xù)存在緊張局勢(shì)和危機(jī)，但大西洋共同體的持久穩(wěn)健性。用來(lái)解釋變化的傳統(tǒng)現(xiàn)實(shí)主義理論不足以研究大西洋共同體，因?yàn)樗鼈冋J(rèn)為，變化是通過(guò)霸權(quán)戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)，強(qiáng)制和討價(jià)還價(jià)而發(fā)生的。但是，大西洋共同體是一個(gè)轉(zhuǎn)變了的無(wú)政府狀態(tài)，解決了安全難題。這意味著其成員可以在戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)結(jié)束前解決所有爭(zhēng)端，并保持對(duì)社區(qū)規(guī)范價(jià)值的反身意識(shí)以及對(duì)維護(hù)社區(qū)的興趣。相反，對(duì)大西洋（安全）共同體的研究需要一種以身份和公眾爭(zhēng)論為重點(diǎn)的話語(yǔ)方法。我利用萊恩·漢森（Lene Hansen）的話語(yǔ)研究方法，對(duì)政策精英關(guān)于聯(lián)盟關(guān)系和政策的公開(kāi)聲明進(jìn)行話語(yǔ)分析。我研究了1956年在蘇伊士，1965年在越南，1990年代初期的波斯尼亞和2003年在伊拉克進(jìn)行的區(qū)域外干預(yù)的相關(guān)辯論，以顯示區(qū)域外，威脅和責(zé)任的定義如何變化時(shí)間，并就大西洋主義的含義進(jìn)行更廣泛的跨時(shí)間分析，以顯示可以從話語(yǔ)中看到鞏固安全共同體的證據(jù)。我使用了一個(gè)三層的理論框架，重點(diǎn)關(guān)注大西洋社區(qū)的背景認(rèn)同及其不斷變化的含義。通過(guò)關(guān)于盟國(guó)彼此期望的爭(zhēng)論來(lái)實(shí)現(xiàn)這一身份；以及盟友在爭(zhēng)執(zhí)時(shí)期的辯論過(guò)程中用來(lái)改變或維護(hù)其社區(qū)。該框架將注意力集中在身份的有用模糊性上，這種模糊性使盟國(guó)可以以有助于維護(hù)社區(qū)的方式來(lái)解釋它。通過(guò)展示盟友如何通過(guò)他們的論點(diǎn)積極地將自己束縛在一起，它也將注意力重新集中在特工在身份建構(gòu)中的重要性上。我得出的結(jié)論是，雖然大西洋共同體的話語(yǔ)發(fā)生了重大變化，而大西洋主義的許多基礎(chǔ)和意義都發(fā)生了變化，但它并未承受話語(yǔ)的變化，因此它本身無(wú)法被人們所認(rèn)識(shí)。

著錄項(xiàng)

  • 作者

    Kitchen, Veronica M.;

  • 作者單位

    Brown University.;

  • 授予單位 Brown University.;
  • 學(xué)科 Political Science General.; Political Science International Law and Relations.
  • 學(xué)位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2006
  • 頁(yè)碼 311 p.
  • 總頁(yè)數(shù) 311
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文語(yǔ)種 eng
  • 中圖分類(lèi) 政治理論;國(guó)際法;
  • 關(guān)鍵詞

相似文獻(xiàn)

  • 外文文獻(xiàn)
  • 中文文獻(xiàn)
  • 專(zhuān)利
獲取原文

客服郵箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公網(wǎng)安備：11010802029741號(hào) ICP備案號(hào)：京ICP備15016152號(hào)-6 六維聯(lián)合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司?版權(quán)所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服務(wù)號(hào)