国产bbaaaaa片,成年美女黄网站色视频免费,成年黄大片,а天堂中文最新一区二区三区,成人精品视频一区二区三区尤物

首頁> 外文學(xué)位 >The partisan's violence, law and apartheid: The assassination of Matthew Goniwe and the Cradock Four.
【24h】

The partisan's violence, law and apartheid: The assassination of Matthew Goniwe and the Cradock Four.

機(jī)譯：黨派的暴力，法律和種族隔離：馬修·戈尼威（Matthew Goniwe）和克拉多克四號(hào)（Cradock Four）被暗殺。

獲取原文
獲取原文并翻譯 | 示例
  • 摘要
  • 著錄項(xiàng)
  • 相似文獻(xiàn)
  • 相關(guān)主題

摘要

This dissertation is a study of an instance of political violence that took place during 1985 in the Eastern Cape province of South Africa, but which had a wider resonance across the country. It involved the killing of four prominent anti-apartheid activists, known as the Cradock Four, by a state security death squad. It is an instance of political violence that allows us to ask ontological questions about the relationship between law, rights and violence; colonial violence and the Cold War, as well as questions about the epistemologies that surround violence in relation to questions of justice. Revisiting this violence, as mediated through the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, this study asks: how does this violence relate to the law itself, since apartheid was after all explicit in its claim to being the product of a legal regime? It argues that we need to think about how this violence against the Cradock Four, committed by a 'death squad'---and therefore orphaned through denial by both law and an official political narrative---related to the constitution of a South African political community, a political community we also have to remind ourselves, which had a colonial genealogy.;To answer these questions I have traced the figures of Matthew Goniwe and his political comrades in two ways. The first half of the dissertation is a study of how they are fashioned in legal discourse---over time mainly as victims of human rights abuses through the Truth and Reconciliation Commission. The second half of the dissertation is a study of their constitution in political discourse, where they become transformed from activists to absolute enemies of the state. In my discussion of this latter transformation, I trace and wish to recover what has become a subaltern narrative: thinking about these activists as instantiations of the forms of what I have called 'the natives revolt', and therefore apartheid's concrete enemy: they are reluctant urban native subjects; neither properly rural and neither properly urban. It is this subject which I argue, finally disrupts the colonial ambitions of apartheid.
機(jī)譯：本文是對(duì)一個(gè)政治暴力事件的研究，該事件發(fā)生在1985年的南非東開普省，但在全國(guó)引起了廣泛的反響。它涉及到國(guó)家安全死亡隊(duì)殺死了四名著名的反種族隔離激進(jìn)分子，即克拉多克四人。這是政治暴力的一個(gè)例子，它使我們可以就法律，權(quán)利與暴力之間的關(guān)系提出本體論問題。殖民暴力和冷戰(zhàn)，以及與正義問題有關(guān)的圍繞暴力的認(rèn)識(shí)論問題。在真相與和解委員會(huì)的調(diào)解下，這項(xiàng)研究重新審視了這種暴力行為：這種種族暴力與法律本身有何關(guān)系，因?yàn)榉N族隔離畢竟明確宣稱是法律制度的產(chǎn)物？它認(rèn)為，我們需要考慮一下由“死亡小隊(duì)”實(shí)施的針對(duì)“克拉多克四號(hào)”的暴力如何-因此因法律和官方政治敘事的否認(rèn)而成為孤兒-與南非憲法有關(guān)政治社區(qū)，我們也要提醒自己一個(gè)殖民地族譜的政治社區(qū)。要回答這些問題，我從兩個(gè)方面追溯了馬修·戈尼威和他的政治同志的人物。論文的前半部分研究了如何在法律話語中塑造它們-隨著時(shí)間的流逝，它們主要是通過真相與和解委員會(huì)成為侵犯人權(quán)行為的受害者。論文的后半部分是在政治話語中研究其構(gòu)成的，他們從激進(jìn)主義者轉(zhuǎn)變?yōu)閲?guó)家的絕對(duì)敵人。在我對(duì)后一種轉(zhuǎn)變的討論中，我追蹤并希望恢復(fù)已成為次要敘事的內(nèi)容：將這些激進(jìn)主義者視為我所謂的“原住民起義”形式的實(shí)例化，因此是種族隔離的具體敵人：他們不愿城市土著科目；既沒有適當(dāng)?shù)霓r(nóng)村，也沒有適當(dāng)?shù)某鞘?。我認(rèn)為正是這個(gè)主題，最終破壞了種族隔離的殖民野心。

著錄項(xiàng)

  • 作者

    Pillay, Suren.;

  • 作者單位

    Columbia University.;

  • 授予單位 Columbia University.;
  • 學(xué)科 Anthropology Cultural.;South African Studies.;Political Science General.;History African.
  • 學(xué)位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2011
  • 頁碼 342 p.
  • 總頁數(shù) 342
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文語種 eng
  • 中圖分類
  • 關(guān)鍵詞

相似文獻(xiàn)

  • 外文文獻(xiàn)
  • 中文文獻(xiàn)
獲取原文

客服郵箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公網(wǎng)安備：11010802029741號(hào) ICP備案號(hào)：京ICP備15016152號(hào)-6 六維聯(lián)合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司?版權(quán)所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服務(wù)號(hào)