国产bbaaaaa片,成年美女黄网站色视频免费,成年黄大片,а天堂中文最新一区二区三区,成人精品视频一区二区三区尤物

首頁> 外文學位 >The liberalization and regulation of trade in financial services: Exercising domestic regulatory authority.
【24h】

The liberalization and regulation of trade in financial services: Exercising domestic regulatory authority.

機譯：金融服務貿易的自由化和監(jiān)管：行使國內監(jiān)管權。

獲取原文
獲取原文并翻譯 | 示例
  • 摘要
  • 著錄項
  • 相似文獻
  • 相關主題

摘要

The Uruguay Round of multilateral trade negotiations was completed at the end of 1993 and established the World Trade Organization (WTO) and the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS). Financial services, including banking, insurance, and securities, are now covered under the Financial Services Agreement (FSA) of the GATS, which oversees the exchange of these services between countries. Creating a comprehensive multilateral agreement in financial services proved challenging, reflecting the growing complexity of financial sector issues in more developing and emerging economies.; This dissertation provides an overview of trade in financial services and evaluates the benefits and drawbacks of the process of liberalization under the FSA. The process is examined in Canada, India, and Singapore, and provides three conclusions. First, liberalizing trade in financial services is a separate process from opening up to more capital flows. This tends to remove it from the criticisms that are often directed at pushing financial deregulation too far and too fast. Second, the GATS raises some special concerns because its rules can affect domestic financial regulations, and the control that governments retain over them. It accounts for this by allowing countries to liberalize only where they choose, and providing the necessary economic safeguards to do so. WTO Members thereby retain a high degree of self-determination in their capacity for prudential regulation and their ability to control their pace of liberalization. Finally, the importance of the FSA has thus far been largely political and structural. There has not been major pressure on countries to liberalize, and the process is more likely conditioned by the domestic factors where it is occurring. Its significance therefore lies in making an effective start, and continuing the relatively new process of liberalizing trade in financial services, without adding unnecessary economic risks.
機譯：烏拉圭回合多邊貿易談判于1993年底完成，建立了世界貿易組織（世貿組織）和《服務貿易總協(xié)定》（GATS）。 GATS的《金融服務協(xié)議》（FSA）現(xiàn)在涵蓋了包括銀行，保險和證券在內的金融服務，該協(xié)議監(jiān)督著國家之間這些服務的交換。在金融服務領域建立全面的多邊協(xié)議被證明是具有挑戰(zhàn)性的，反映出更多的發(fā)展中和新興經濟體中金融部門問題的復雜性日益增加。本文概述了金融服務貿易，并評估了金融服務協(xié)定下自由化進程的利弊。在加拿大，印度和新加坡檢查了該過程，并提供了三個結論。首先，自由化金融服務貿易是一個開放過程，而不是開放更多的資本流動。這傾向于將其從經常將金融放松管制推得過快和過快的批評中刪除。第二，《服務貿易總協(xié)定》引起了一些特殊的關注，因為其規(guī)則可能會影響國內金融法規(guī)以及政府對其保留的控制權。為此，它允許各國僅在自己選擇的地方放開貿易，并為此提供必要的經濟保障。因此，世貿組織成員在審慎監(jiān)管能力和控制自由化步伐的能力上保持高度的自決權。最后，到目前為止，F(xiàn)SA的重要性在很大程度上是政治上和結構上的。各國沒有施加很大的自由化壓力，而且這一進程更有可能受到其發(fā)生的國內因素的制約。因此，其意義在于有效地開始并繼續(xù)相對較新的自由化金融服務貿易的過程，而不增加不必要的經濟風險。

著錄項

  • 作者

    Gensey, Guy V. T.;

  • 作者單位

    Dalhousie University (Canada).;

  • 授予單位 Dalhousie University (Canada).;
  • 學科 Political Science International Law and Relations.
  • 學位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2003
  • 頁碼 384 p.
  • 總頁數(shù) 384
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文語種 eng
  • 中圖分類 國際法;
  • 關鍵詞

相似文獻

  • 外文文獻
  • 中文文獻
  • 專利
獲取原文

客服郵箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公網安備：11010802029741號 ICP備案號：京ICP備15016152號-6 六維聯(lián)合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司?版權所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服務號