国产bbaaaaa片,成年美女黄网站色视频免费,成年黄大片,а天堂中文最新一区二区三区,成人精品视频一区二区三区尤物

首頁> 外文學(xué)位 >Mapping artifacts on the frontier of ancient China: An approach to study of the Yan mountainous area in the eastern Zhou period (8th--3rd centuries BC).
【24h】

Mapping artifacts on the frontier of ancient China: An approach to study of the Yan mountainous area in the eastern Zhou period (8th--3rd centuries BC).

機(jī)譯:在中國古代邊疆上繪制文物:研究東周時(shí)期(公元前8至3世紀(jì))的燕山地區(qū)的一種方法。

獲取原文
獲取原文并翻譯 | 示例

摘要

Study of the late Zhou period in China has concentrated on analysis of the agrarian-based states. Interaction between those who constituted the Chinese dynastic states and pastoral peoples on the periphery of them were often described in hostile or colonial terms. With only the official histories as guides, an explanation that drew strict boundaries between them prevailed until the late 20th century. With increased archaeological information documenting activity outside of dynastic centers, the former interpretation can be tested. An alternative scenario at the frontier is proposed here.; Study of artifacts, their disposition and cultural use have provided the basic tool for identifying distinctive life ways and affiliations. Both Chinese and frontier burial materials and practices have been researched and interpreted with knowledge of and comparison to other “border” societies and theory about frontiers and their function in relation to a central political unit. Focus is on the Yan Mountain region and its relation to the Zhou vassal state of Yan in northeast China.; This study below shows that both the “Shanrong” group of the Yan Mountain region and the Yan State had their own distinctive social order, cultural traditions and economic bases. Those are marked in the burial assemblages, tomb structures and architectural remains, suggesting that “Shanrong” was a pastoral and warrior society and was clearly different from the agrarian society of the Yan State. On the one hand, these differences contributed to the formation of an ethnic and cultural boundary; but on the other hand, these different modes of subsistence encouraged them to complement each other functionally, thus making the “Shanrong” part of a larger social complex.; This case study demonstrates that the boundary between the “Shanrong” and the Yan State was fluid and was based on need. Interactions in trade, war and colonization occurring in the frontier zone exhibit evidence of the change through time. Technical and ecological factors stimulated a transformation of the structure of interchange on the pastoral/agricultural frontier. In addition, the elite groups from the Yan State and the “Shanrong” both played significant roles during the process, indicating that political authority still deeply influenced their interactions. Finally, inter-group contacts infused energy into the area and led these two groups to incorporate into a unified, multicultural Chinese kingdom.
機(jī)譯:在中國,周末時(shí)期的研究集中在對以農(nóng)業(yè)為基礎(chǔ)的國家的分析上。構(gòu)成中國王朝的國家與周圍的牧民之間的互動(dòng)常常以敵對或殖民的方式來描述。僅以官方歷史為指導(dǎo),直到二十世紀(jì)后期才在兩者之間劃定了嚴(yán)格的界限。隨著王朝中心以外考古資料的記錄活動(dòng)的增加,可以檢驗(yàn)以前的解釋。在這里提出了一種在邊界的替代方案。對人工制品,其處置和文化使用的研究為識別獨(dú)特的生活方式和隸屬關(guān)系提供了基本工具。已經(jīng)研究和解釋了中國和邊境的materials葬材料和做法,并與其他“邊境”社會(huì)以及關(guān)于邊境及其在中央政治部門中的功能的理論進(jìn)行了了解和比較。重點(diǎn)是燕山地區(qū)及其與東北地區(qū)周氏諸侯國的關(guān)系。下面的研究表明,燕山地區(qū)的“山榮”群體和the邦都具有自己獨(dú)特的社會(huì)秩序,文化傳統(tǒng)和經(jīng)濟(jì)基礎(chǔ)。這些在墓葬組合,墓葬結(jié)構(gòu)和建筑殘骸中都有明顯的標(biāo)記,表明“山榮”是一個(gè)牧民和戰(zhàn)士社會(huì),與from邦的農(nóng)業(yè)社會(huì)明顯不同。一方面,這些差異促進(jìn)了民族和文化邊界的形成;但是,另一方面,這些不同的生存方式鼓勵(lì)它們在功能上相互補(bǔ)充,從而使“山榮”成為更大的社會(huì)綜合體的一部分。該案例研究表明,“山榮”與the邦之間的邊界是流動(dòng)的,是基于需求的。在邊境地區(qū)發(fā)生的貿(mào)易,戰(zhàn)爭和殖民化的相互作用證明了隨著時(shí)間的推移發(fā)生了變化。技術(shù)和生態(tài)因素刺激了牧區(qū)/農(nóng)業(yè)邊界交換結(jié)構(gòu)的轉(zhuǎn)變。此外,the邦和“山榮”的精英團(tuán)體在這一過程中都發(fā)揮了重要作用,這表明政治權(quán)威仍然深深地影響著他們的互動(dòng)。最后,團(tuán)體之間的接觸為該地區(qū)注入了能量,并導(dǎo)致這兩個(gè)團(tuán)體融入了一個(gè)統(tǒng)一的多元文化的中國王國。

著錄項(xiàng)

  • 作者

    Li, Jian-jing.;

  • 作者單位

    University of Pittsburgh.;

  • 授予單位 University of Pittsburgh.;
  • 學(xué)科 Art History.; History Asia Australia and Oceania.
  • 學(xué)位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2000
  • 頁碼 143 p.
  • 總頁數(shù) 143
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文語種 eng
  • 中圖分類 藝術(shù)史、藝術(shù)思想史;世界史;
  • 關(guān)鍵詞

相似文獻(xiàn)

  • 外文文獻(xiàn)
  • 中文文獻(xiàn)
  • 專利
獲取原文

客服郵箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公網(wǎng)安備:11010802029741號 ICP備案號:京ICP備15016152號-6 六維聯(lián)合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司?版權(quán)所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服務(wù)號