国产bbaaaaa片,成年美女黄网站色视频免费,成年黄大片,а天堂中文最新一区二区三区,成人精品视频一区二区三区尤物

首頁> 外文學(xué)位 >Classical liberalism and press theory: An analysis of metanarratival influence in the creation of press narratives about attempts to reform the General Mining Law of 1872
【24h】

Classical liberalism and press theory: An analysis of metanarratival influence in the creation of press narratives about attempts to reform the General Mining Law of 1872

機(jī)譯：古典自由主義和新聞理論：關(guān)于敘事創(chuàng)作中敘事形式的影響的分析，涉及嘗試改革1872年《通用采礦法》的情況

獲取原文
獲取原文并翻譯 | 示例
  • 摘要
  • 著錄項(xiàng)
  • 相似文獻(xiàn)
  • 相關(guān)主題

摘要

This dissertation examines certain press narratives to determine whether a tension exists between traditional theories of the press and theories that allege ideological roots of environmental degradation. The dissertation applies a rhetorical critique to comment on arguments that the ideological roots of theories of the press constrain press narratives from including marginalized viewpoints.;Three methods of analysis provide triangulation. Two methods of Burkeian rhetorical criticism are used: pentadic analysis and cluster criticism. A third method--thematic identification--that relies on Burkeian principles is also used.;The dissertation finds that a metanarrative of classical liberalism underlies the symbolic constructions in press narratives regarding attempts to reform the General Mining Law of 1872. Pentadic analysis finds that scene is the dominant pentadic term, allowing materialism to be identified as the philosophy that houses these press narratives. Cluster criticism identifies key terms related to classical liberalism as dominant in the narratives. These key terms include restrictions, ownership, economic value, productivity/use, magnitude/quantification, time, opposite/fair market value, power, and compromise/negotiation, Cluster criticism finds that these terms are intimately related and interconnected. Thematic identification augments these findings, showing that themes of domination, ownership and use, compromises, control, consequences, and technological determination are conspicuously present in the narratives. The theme of sanctity is found to be virtually absent.;The dissertation argues that those who are identified as holders of power have the capacity to control the events depicted in the sampled set of press narratives. It argues that viewing the mining law reform issue--and the press' participation in the symbolic construction of the issue--solely in terms of contestation between power holders and power seekers misses broader, more important social and cultural concerns. The dissertation argues that these findings support a theoretical position that the press is a partner in the articulation of the accepted rules, premises and rituals of social and cultural life with all other dominant social institutions. It argues that discourse that focuses solely on the press as a conspirator or a powerbroker leaves current ideologically grounded constructs unexamined and unavailable for public inspection for purposes of continued acceptance or enlightened rejection.
機(jī)譯：本文研究了某些新聞界的敘述，以確定傳統(tǒng)的新聞界理論與宣稱環(huán)境退化的意識(shí)形態(tài)根源的理論之間是否存在張力。論文運(yùn)用修辭學(xué)評(píng)論的方式評(píng)論了新聞理論的意識(shí)形態(tài)根源包括邊緣化觀點(diǎn)而限制了新聞敘事的論點(diǎn)。三種分析方法提供了三角剖分。使用了Burkeian修辭批評(píng)的兩種方法：五分分析和集群批評(píng)。還使用了第三種方法，即主題識(shí)別法，該方法依賴于伯克主義原理。論文發(fā)現(xiàn)，古典自由主義的元敘事是新聞敘述中有關(guān)改革1872年《通用采礦法》的嘗試的象征性構(gòu)造的基礎(chǔ)。五邊形分析發(fā)現(xiàn)場(chǎng)景是占主導(dǎo)地位的五角形術(shù)語，使唯物主義可以被確定為包含這些新聞敘事的哲學(xué)。集群批評(píng)指出與古典自由主義有關(guān)的關(guān)鍵術(shù)語在敘事中占主導(dǎo)地位。這些關(guān)鍵術(shù)語包括限制，所有權(quán)，經(jīng)濟(jì)價(jià)值，生產(chǎn)率/使用，數(shù)量/數(shù)量，時(shí)間，對(duì)立/公平的市場(chǎng)價(jià)值，權(quán)力和妥協(xié)/談判，集群批評(píng)認(rèn)為這些術(shù)語密切相關(guān)且相互聯(lián)系。主題識(shí)別增加了這些發(fā)現(xiàn)，表明敘事中明顯存在著支配，所有權(quán)和使用，妥協(xié)，控制，后果和技術(shù)確定等主題。發(fā)現(xiàn)實(shí)際上沒有神圣的主題。論文認(rèn)為，那些被確認(rèn)為權(quán)力持有者的人有能力控制新聞敘事樣本中描述的事件。它認(rèn)為，僅就權(quán)力持有人和尋求權(quán)力者之間的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)而言，查看采礦法改革問題以及媒體對(duì)這一問題的象征性解釋的參與，就錯(cuò)過了更廣泛，更重要的社會(huì)和文化關(guān)注。論文認(rèn)為，這些發(fā)現(xiàn)支持了一個(gè)理論立場(chǎng)，即新聞界是與所有其他主要社會(huì)制度一起闡明社會(huì)和文化生活的公認(rèn)規(guī)則，前提和儀式的伙伴。它辯稱，僅以新聞界作為陰謀家或強(qiáng)權(quán)經(jīng)紀(jì)人為重點(diǎn)的論述，使當(dāng)前基于意識(shí)形態(tài)的構(gòu)架未經(jīng)審查，也無法為繼續(xù)接受或開明的拒絕而供公眾檢查。

著錄項(xiàng)

  • 作者

    Wilkins, Dennis Mark.;

  • 作者單位

    University of Colorado at Boulder.;

  • 授予單位 University of Colorado at Boulder.;
  • 學(xué)科 Mass communication.;Journalism.;Law.;Environmental science.
  • 學(xué)位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1996
  • 頁碼 481 p.
  • 總頁數(shù) 481
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文語種 eng
  • 中圖分類
  • 關(guān)鍵詞

相似文獻(xiàn)

  • 外文文獻(xiàn)
  • 中文文獻(xiàn)
  • 專利
獲取原文

客服郵箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公網(wǎng)安備：11010802029741號(hào) ICP備案號(hào)：京ICP備15016152號(hào)-6 六維聯(lián)合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司?版權(quán)所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服務(wù)號(hào)