国产bbaaaaa片,成年美女黄网站色视频免费,成年黄大片,а天堂中文最新一区二区三区,成人精品视频一区二区三区尤物

首頁> 外文學位 >How Nice of You, Doctor: Adorno's Freudian Ethics.
【24h】

How Nice of You, Doctor: Adorno's Freudian Ethics.

機譯：您真好，醫(yī)生：阿多諾的弗洛伊德倫理學。

獲取原文
獲取原文并翻譯 | 示例
  • 摘要
  • 著錄項
  • 相似文獻
  • 相關(guān)主題

摘要

This dissertation represents an attempt to construct an account of Adorno's ethics in terms of the Freudian understanding of the human being that undergirds Adorno's thought. It thus proceeds in two directions. First, it aims to illustrate the inadequacies in current attempts to reconstruct the ethical content found in Adorno's work. This involves examining not just the content of such reconstructions but also the implicit motivation that drives them and leads them to place a greater emphasis on certain aspects of Adorno's thought over others. Second, it makes the case that such an approach leads to an increased appreciation of the implicit Freudian content of his work and attempts to bring it out further. This involves reconsidering the fate of Freud in the Frankfurt School.;These two directions are thus pursued in the following fashion. First, there is an initial examination of projects of reconstructing Adorno's ethics as a coherent whole. In contradistinction to this tendency, it is argued that a true reading of Adorno must follow the same approach as Adorno advocated of Bach -- an x-ray which would illuminate the hidden links of his work while also recognizing that such links need not form a coherent whole. The case is then made, by examining Adorno's work on the culture industry, of its centrality to his thought and, thereby, the central importance of the Freudian understanding of the human being. This results in an extended examination of the reception of Freud in the Frankfurt School from Fromm onward, and aims to show that the attempts to distance Adorno from Marcuse cannot hide the affinities between the two. This further leads to a possible reconstruction of what a Freudian ethic would be and what its relevance might be for us today. Finally, there is an extended treatment of how such insights relate to Adorno's own relation to the student movement in Germany, which shows the limitations of his own understanding of the ethical content of his work, as well as how he was unable to recognize the repressive potential in institutionalized psychoanalysis.
機譯：這篇論文代表了一種嘗試，是根據(jù)弗洛伊德式的關(guān)于支撐阿多諾思想的人的理解來構(gòu)造阿多諾的倫理學。因此，它在兩個方向上進行。首先，它旨在說明當前在重建阿多諾作品中發(fā)現(xiàn)的道德內(nèi)容方面的不足之處。這不僅要檢查這種重建的內(nèi)容，還要研究驅(qū)動它們的內(nèi)在動機，并促使它們更加強調(diào)阿多諾思想的某些方面而不是其他方面。其次，它證明了這種方法導致人們對弗洛伊德著作中隱含的內(nèi)容有了更多的了解，并試圖將其進一步發(fā)揚光大。這涉及重新考慮弗洛伊德在法蘭克福學派的命運。因此，這兩個方向的遵循方式如下。首先，對重建阿多諾倫理作為一個整體的項目進行了初步檢查。與這種趨勢相反的是，有人認為，對阿多諾的真實閱讀必須遵循阿多諾倡導巴赫的相同方法——X射線可以照亮他的作品的隱藏鏈接，同時也認識到這樣的鏈接不需要形成連貫的整體。然后，通過考察阿多諾在文化產(chǎn)業(yè)上的工作來論證其對他的思想的中心性，從而對弗洛伊德對人類的理解的中心重要性。這導致從弗洛姆起對法蘭克福學校中弗洛伊德的接待進行了更深入的考察，目的是表明試圖使阿多諾與馬爾庫塞保持距離不能掩蓋兩者之間的親和力。這進一步導致了弗洛伊德倫理學的可能重構(gòu)及其對我們今天的意義。最后，對這種見解如何與阿多諾自身與德國學生運動的關(guān)系進行了擴展處理，這表明了他自己對自己作品的道德內(nèi)容的理解的局限性，以及他如何無法識別壓抑性行為。制度化精神分析的潛力。

著錄項

  • 作者

    Bartholomew, Jake M.;

  • 作者單位

    State University of New York at Binghamton.;

  • 授予單位 State University of New York at Binghamton.;
  • 學科 Philosophy.;Ethics.
  • 學位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2017
  • 頁碼 347 p.
  • 總頁數(shù) 347
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文語種 eng
  • 中圖分類 水產(chǎn)、漁業(yè);
  • 關(guān)鍵詞

相似文獻

  • 外文文獻
  • 中文文獻
  • 專利
獲取原文

客服郵箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公網(wǎng)安備：11010802029741號 ICP備案號：京ICP備15016152號-6 六維聯(lián)合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司?版權(quán)所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服務號