国产bbaaaaa片,成年美女黄网站色视频免费,成年黄大片,а天堂中文最新一区二区三区,成人精品视频一区二区三区尤物

首頁> 美國衛(wèi)生研究院文獻>Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery >The Unfulfilled Promise of Inhaled Therapy in Ventilator-Associated Infections: Where Do We Go from Here?
【2h】

The Unfulfilled Promise of Inhaled Therapy in Ventilator-Associated Infections: Where Do We Go from Here?

機譯:吸入療法在呼吸機相關(guān)感染中未兌現(xiàn)的承諾:我們該何去何從?

代理獲取
本網(wǎng)站僅為用戶提供外文OA文獻查詢和代理獲取服務,本網(wǎng)站沒有原文。下單后我們將采用程序或人工為您竭誠獲取高質(zhì)量的原文,但由于OA文獻來源多樣且變更頻繁,仍可能出現(xiàn)獲取不到、文獻不完整或與標題不符等情況,如果獲取不到我們將提供退款服務。請知悉。

摘要

Respiratory infection is common in intubated/tracheotomized patients and systemic antibiotic therapy is often unrewarding. In 1967, the difficulty in treating Gram-negative respiratory infections led to the use of inhaled gentamicin, targeting therapy directly to the lungs. Fifty-three years later, the effects of topical therapy in the intubated patient remain undefined. Clinical failures with intravenous antibiotics persist and instrumented patients are now infected by many more multidrug-resistant Gram-negative species as well as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Multiple systematic reviews and meta-analyses suggest that there may be a role for inhaled delivery but “more research is needed.” Yet there is still no Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved inhaled antibiotic for the treatment of ventilator-associated infection, the hallmark of which is the foreign body in the upper airway. Current pulmonary and infectious disease guidelines suggest using aerosols only in the setting of Gram-negative infections that are resistant to all systemic antibiotics or not to use them at all. Recently two seemingly well-designed large randomized placebo-controlled Phase 2 and Phase 3 clinical trials of adjunctive inhaled therapy for the treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia failed to show more rapid resolution of pneumonia symptoms or effect on mortality. Despite evolving technology of delivery devices and more detailed understanding of the factors affecting delivery, treatment effects were no better than placebo. What is wrong with our approach to ventilator- associated infection? Is there a message from the large meta-analyses and these two large recent multisite trials? This review will suggest why current therapies are unpredictable and have not fulfilled the promise of better outcomes. Data suggest that future studies of inhaled therapy, in the milieu of worsening bacterial resistance, require new approaches with completely different indications and endpoints to determine whether inhaled therapy indeed has an important role in the treatment of ventilated patients.
機譯:呼吸道感染在插管/氣管切開患者中很常見,全身性抗生素治療通常沒有回報。1967 年,治療革蘭氏陰性呼吸道感染的困難導致使用吸入慶大霉素,直接針對肺部進行靶向治療。53 年后,局部治療對插管患者的影響仍未確定。靜脈注射抗生素的臨床失敗持續(xù)存在,接受器械治療的患者現(xiàn)在感染了更多的多重耐藥革蘭氏陰性菌種以及耐甲氧西林金黃色葡萄球菌。多項系統(tǒng)評價和薈萃分析表明,吸入式給藥可能有作用,但“需要更多的研究”。然而,仍然沒有美國食品和藥物管理局 (FDA) 批準用于治療呼吸機相關(guān)感染的吸入抗生素,其標志是上氣道中的異物。目前的肺部和傳染病指南建議僅在對所有全身性抗生素耐藥的革蘭氏陰性感染的情況下使用氣霧劑,或者根本不使用氣霧劑。最近,兩項看似設計良好的大型隨機安慰劑對照 2 期和 3 期臨床試驗,用于輔助吸入療法治療呼吸機相關(guān)性肺炎,未能顯示肺炎癥狀的更快消退或?qū)λ劳雎实挠绊憽1M管輸送裝置的技術(shù)不斷發(fā)展,并且對影響輸送的因素有了更詳細的了解,但治療效果并不比安慰劑好。我們處理呼吸機相關(guān)感染的方法有什么問題?大型薈萃分析和最近的這兩項大型多中心試驗是否傳達了信息?本綜述將說明為什么目前的療法是不可預測的,并且沒有實現(xiàn)更好結(jié)果的承諾。數(shù)據(jù)表明,在細菌耐藥性惡化的環(huán)境中,未來對吸入療法的研究需要具有完全不同適應癥和終點的新方法,以確定吸入療法是否確實在通氣患者的治療中具有重要作用。

著錄項

代理獲取

客服郵箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公網(wǎng)安備:11010802029741號 ICP備案號:京ICP備15016152號-6 六維聯(lián)合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司?版權(quán)所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服務號