国产bbaaaaa片,成年美女黄网站色视频免费,成年黄大片,а天堂中文最新一区二区三区,成人精品视频一区二区三区尤物

首頁> 外文期刊>Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies >287(g) and the Politics of Interior Immigration Control in the United States: Explaining Local Cooperation with Federal Immigration Authorities
【24h】

287(g) and the Politics of Interior Immigration Control in the United States: Explaining Local Cooperation with Federal Immigration Authorities

機(jī)譯:287(g)與美國(guó)的內(nèi)部移民控制政策:與聯(lián)邦移民局的地方合作說明

獲取原文
獲取原文并翻譯 | 示例

摘要

This paper aims to improve our understanding of emerging patterns of interior immigration control in the United States by examining local law enforcement cooperation with federal immigration authorities under the 287(g) Program. While several recent studies have drawn attention to the shifting terrain of immigration enforcement away from borders into the interior, few have attempted to systematically explain reasons for this shift. Using a county-level dataset of all counties in the United States, this study finds that, despite the purported links between the 287(g) Program and public safety, county crime rates are not significantly related to local cooperation with federal immigration authorities. Rather, the results indicate that local decisions to engage in immigration control efforts are driven by political factors, particularly a county's partisan composition, and demographic pressures related to increases in the Hispanic/Latino population. Demography is not, however, destiny, as new immigration in localities with established foreign-born populations does not significantly increase the likelihood of cooperation under 287(g). This suggests that the partisan composition of the places where immigrants settle mediates the extent to which the demand for tighter immigration enforcement exceeds the political influence immigrant communities have in their efforts to contest restrictive immigration control policies.View full textDownload full textKeywordsUnited States, Immigration Control, Interior Immigration Enforcement, Politics of Immigration, Partisanship, 287(g) ProgramRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2012.667983
機(jī)譯:本文旨在通過研究根據(jù)287(g)計(jì)劃與聯(lián)邦移民當(dāng)局進(jìn)行的地方執(zhí)法合作,增進(jìn)我們對(duì)美國(guó)內(nèi)部移民控制新興模式的了解。盡管最近的一些研究引起了人們對(duì)移民執(zhí)法從邊界向內(nèi)陸轉(zhuǎn)移的關(guān)注,但很少有人試圖系統(tǒng)地解釋這種轉(zhuǎn)移的原因。使用美國(guó)所有縣的縣級(jí)數(shù)據(jù)集,本研究發(fā)現(xiàn),盡管據(jù)稱287(g)計(jì)劃與公共安全之間存在聯(lián)系,但縣犯罪率與與聯(lián)邦移民當(dāng)局的當(dāng)?shù)睾献麝P(guān)系并不顯著。相反,結(jié)果表明,參與移民管制工作的地方?jīng)Q策是由政治因素(特別是一個(gè)縣的黨派組成)以及與西班牙裔/拉丁美洲裔人口增加有關(guān)的人口壓力所驅(qū)動(dòng)的。然而,人口統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)并不是命運(yùn),因?yàn)樵谟型鈬?guó)出生人口的地方,新移民并不會(huì)顯著增加根據(jù)287(g)進(jìn)行合作的可能性。這表明,移民定居地的黨派組成在一定程度上介導(dǎo)了對(duì)更嚴(yán)格的移民執(zhí)法的需求超出了移民社區(qū)在努力對(duì)抗限制性移民控制政策方面的政治影響的程度。查看全文下載全文關(guān)鍵詞內(nèi)部移民執(zhí)法,移民政治,游擊黨,287(g)程序相關(guān)var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在線”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google ,more“,pubid:” ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候選列表鏈接永久鏈接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2012.667983

著錄項(xiàng)

相似文獻(xiàn)

  • 外文文獻(xiàn)
  • 中文文獻(xiàn)
  • 專利
獲取原文

客服郵箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公網(wǎng)安備:11010802029741號(hào) ICP備案號(hào):京ICP備15016152號(hào)-6 六維聯(lián)合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司?版權(quán)所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服務(wù)號(hào)