国产bbaaaaa片,成年美女黄网站色视频免费,成年黄大片,а天堂中文最新一区二区三区,成人精品视频一区二区三区尤物

首頁> 外文期刊>Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies >a??They Called Them Communists Thena??a?|a??What D'You Call a??Em Now?a??a?|a??Insurgents?a??. Narratives of British Military Expatriates in the Context of the New Imperialism
【24h】

a??They Called Them Communists Thena??a?|a??What D'You Call a??Em Now?a??a?|a??Insurgents?a??. Narratives of British Military Expatriates in the Context of the New Imperialism

機譯：“他們然后稱他們?yōu)楣伯a黨員”-D'You稱其為“ Em Now？”（叛亂分子）。新帝國主義語境下的英國軍人敘事

獲取原文
獲取原文并翻譯 | 示例
  • 摘要
  • 著錄項
  • 相似文獻
  • 相關主題

摘要

This paper addresses the question of the extent to which the colonial past provides material for contemporary actors' understanding of difference. The research from which the paper is drawn involved interview and ethnographic work in three largely white working-class estates in an English provincial city. For this paper we focus on ten life-history interviews with older participants who had spent some time abroad in the British military. Our analysis adopts a postcolonial framework because research participants' current constructions of an amorphous a??Othera?? (labelled variously as black people, immigrants, foreigners, asylum-seekers or Muslims) reveal strong continuities with discourses deployed by the same individuals to narrate their past experiences of living and working as either military expatriates or spouses during British colonial rule. Theoretically, the paper engages with the work of Frantz Fanon and Edward Said. In keeping with a postcolonial approach, we work against essentialised notions of identity based on a??racea?? or class. Although we establish continuity between white working-class military emigration in the past and contemporary racialised discourses, we argue that the latter are not class-specific, being as much the creations of the middle-class media and political elite.View full textDownload full textKeywordsBritish Emigration, Postcolonialism, New Imperialism, Immigration, a??Racea??Related var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13691831003687741
機譯：本文探討的問題是殖民時代在多大程度上為當代演員的差異理解提供了素材。本文的研究涉及在英國一個省級城市的三個白人工人階級階層進行的采訪和人種志研究。在本文中，我們重點介紹了十次生活史訪談，采訪了在國外度過一段時間的英國軍人的老年參與者。我們的分析采用了后殖民的框架，因為研究參與者當前對無定形的“其他”（其他被稱為黑人，移民，外國人，尋求庇護者或穆斯林的標記）的構造顯示出強烈的連續(xù)性，這些連續(xù)性由同一個人進行敘述他們過去在英國殖民統(tǒng)治期間作為軍事外籍人士或配偶生活和工作的經歷。從理論上講，該論文與Frantz Fanon和Edward Edward的工作有關。與后殖民主義方法保持一致，我們反對基于“種族”或階級的本質化身份觀念。盡管我們建立了過去白人工人階級軍事移民與當代種族化言論之間的連續(xù)性，但我們認為后者不是特定于階級的，而是中產階級媒體和政治精英的創(chuàng)造。查看全文下載全文關鍵字英國移民，后殖民主義，新帝國主義，移民，“種族”相關的變量add add_id google，more“，發(fā)布號：” ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候選列表鏈接永久鏈接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13691831003687741

著錄項

相似文獻

  • 外文文獻
  • 中文文獻
  • 專利
獲取原文

客服郵箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公網安備：11010802029741號 ICP備案號：京ICP備15016152號-6 六維聯(lián)合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司?版權所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服務號