国产bbaaaaa片,成年美女黄网站色视频免费,成年黄大片,а天堂中文最新一区二区三区,成人精品视频一区二区三区尤物

首頁> 外文OA文獻 >The Role of Working Memory Resources in Mind Wandering: The Difference Between Working Memory Capacity and Working Memory Load
【2h】

The Role of Working Memory Resources in Mind Wandering: The Difference Between Working Memory Capacity and Working Memory Load

機譯:工作記憶資源在游蕩中的作用:工作記憶容量和工作記憶負荷之間的差異

代理獲取
本網(wǎng)站僅為用戶提供外文OA文獻查詢和代理獲取服務,本網(wǎng)站沒有原文。下單后我們將采用程序或人工為您竭誠獲取高質(zhì)量的原文,但由于OA文獻來源多樣且變更頻繁,仍可能出現(xiàn)獲取不到、文獻不完整或與標題不符等情況,如果獲取不到我們將提供退款服務。請知悉。

摘要

There is no consensus on the relationship between working memory resources and mind wandering. The purpose of the current study is to investigate whether mind wandering requires working memory resources to be sustained. The resource-demanding view is that mind wandering requires working memory resources to sustain an internal train of thought (Smallwood, 2010). The resource-free view is that mind wandering is a result of executive control failures and this internal train of thought proceeds in a resource-free manner (McVay u26 Kane, 2010). Participants were presented with thought probes while they performed a Simon task in single and dual task conditions. From the resource-demanding view, individuals with high WMC should experience more Task unrelated thought (TUT) in single and dual task conditions compared to those with low WMC. From the resource-free view, individuals with high WMC should experience fewer TUT compared to low WMC individuals. Results indicated that, WML eliminated the Simon effect for high WMC and reduced it for low WMC group. Mind wandering was decreased in dual task conditions however there was no effect of working memory capacity on mind wandering. Also, mind wandering correlated with task performance measures for the low WMC but not high WMC group. The results of the current study do not provide strong support for either a resource-demanding or resource-free view and are discussed in terms of a context dependent relationship between WMC and mind wandering
機譯:關(guān)于工作記憶資源和思維游蕩之間的關(guān)系尚無共識。本研究的目的是調(diào)查思維游蕩是否需要維持工作記憶資源。資源需求的觀點是,思維游蕩需要工作記憶資源來維持內(nèi)部思維方式(Smallwood,2010)。不依賴資源的觀點是,思想流浪是執(zhí)行控制失敗的結(jié)果,并且這種內(nèi)部思路是以不依賴資源的方式進行的(McVay u26 Kane,2010)。向參與者展示了在單任務和雙任務條件下執(zhí)行Simon任務時的思想探究。從資源需求的角度來看,與WMC較低的人相比,WMC較高的人在單任務和雙重任務條件下應經(jīng)歷更多的任務無關(guān)思想(TUT)。從無資源的角度來看,與低WMC個人相比,具有較高WMC個人應具有更少的TUT。結(jié)果表明,WML消除了高WMC組的西蒙效應,而降低了低WMC組的西蒙效應。在雙重任務條件下,思維游蕩減少了,但是工作記憶容量對思維游蕩沒有影響。此外,對于低WMC群體而言,思維游蕩與任務績效指標相關(guān),而與高WMC群體無關(guān)。當前的研究結(jié)果未對資源需求或無資源的觀點提供有力的支持,并根據(jù)WMC與思維游蕩之間的上下文相關(guān)關(guān)系進行了討論。

著錄項

  • 作者

    Tsukahara Jason Seiichi;

  • 作者單位
  • 年度 2014
  • 總頁數(shù)
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文語種
  • 中圖分類

相似文獻

  • 外文文獻
  • 中文文獻
  • 專利

客服郵箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公網(wǎng)安備:11010802029741號 ICP備案號:京ICP備15016152號-6 六維聯(lián)合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司?版權(quán)所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服務號