国产bbaaaaa片,成年美女黄网站色视频免费,成年黄大片,а天堂中文最新一区二区三区,成人精品视频一区二区三区尤物

首頁> 外文學位 >A generative failure: The public hearings of South Africa's Truth and Reconciliation Commission.
【24h】

A generative failure: The public hearings of South Africa's Truth and Reconciliation Commission.

機譯：生成失?。耗戏钦嫦嗯c和解委員會的公開聽證會。

獲取原文
獲取原文并翻譯 | 示例
  • 摘要
  • 著錄項
  • 相似文獻
  • 相關(guān)主題

摘要

Whether it is considered a "postmodern rhetorical democracy" (Salazar) or merely an "ordinary country" (Alexander), the 'new' South Africa has captured the imagination of those committed to social transformation and democratic praxis in the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries. This dissertation examines the memory debates instigated by the public hearings of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC). The TRC played a constitutive role in South Africa's transition from apartheid to democracy. It sought to produce an official memory of the human rights violations that occurred between 1960 and 1994. Many critics claim that the Commission's imbricated goals of nation-building and reconciliation curtailed the rhetoric of its public hearings for the victims and perpetrators of apartheid. I contend, in contrast, that the Commission's attempt to produce an official memory to foster these goals instead engendered on-going interpretive uptake of the past and its relevance to the present and future---what this dissertation calls "public memory." I argue that participants found ways to frame their memories in accordance with their values and priorities, and, in some instances, took advantage of the public forum of the hearings to critique the Commission's adoption of a human rights paradigm. The TRC, especially during its public hearings phase, was thus a "generative" failure, as it activated a culture of public memory. Rhetorical hermeneutics, which tracks paths of thought in the form of arguments and tropes, enables this dissertation's multi-media, trans-temporal, and transnational examination. I analyze select transcripts of the Commission's public hearings; two literary and one photographic representation of the Commission's process; and a non-governmental organization that promotes on-going memory work in South Africa and transnationally. My project coheres around a central rhetorical concern---the ways in which spoken, silent, visual and institutional symbolic actions shape South Africans' understanding of their past, and influence identity formation and deliberative practices both in the new South Africa and in sites influenced by the South African model of transitional justice.
機譯：無論是被視為“后現(xiàn)代修辭民主”（Salazar）還是僅被視為“普通國家”（亞歷山大），“新”南非都吸引了那些在二十世紀后期和二十世紀初致力于社會轉(zhuǎn)型和民主實踐的人們的想象力-第一個世紀。本文研究了真相與和解委員會（TRC）公開聽證會所引發(fā)的記憶辯論。真相與和解委員會在南非從種族隔離到民主的過渡中發(fā)揮了重要作用。它力圖正式記錄1960年至1994年之間發(fā)生的侵犯人權(quán)行為。許多批評家聲稱，委員會為民族建設(shè)與和解而奮斗的目標削弱了其針對種族隔離的受害者和肇事者的公開聽證的言論。相反，我認為，委員會為建立這些目標而建立官方記憶的嘗試反而導致對過去及其與現(xiàn)在和未來的相關(guān)性的持續(xù)詮釋，這就是本文所說的“公共記憶”。我認為，與會者找到了根據(jù)自己的價值觀和優(yōu)先次序來構(gòu)想自己的記憶的方式，并且在某些情況下，利用聽證會的公共論壇來批評委員會采用人權(quán)范式。真相與和解委員會，特別是在公開聽證會期間，因為它激發(fā)了公眾記憶的文化，因此是“產(chǎn)生性的”失敗。修辭詮釋學以論據(jù)和比喻的形式追蹤思想的路徑，使本文能夠進行多媒體，跨時空和跨國的考察。我分析委員會公開聽證會的部分筆錄；委員會工作過程的兩篇文學作品和一張照片；一個非政府組織，負責在南非和跨國范圍內(nèi)促進正在進行的記憶工作。我的項目圍繞一個中心的修辭關(guān)注點-口頭，沉默，視覺和機構(gòu)象征性行為塑造南非人對其過去的理解的方式，并影響新南非和受影響地區(qū)的身份形成和協(xié)商做法南非的過渡司法模式。

著錄項

  • 作者

    Mack, Katherine Elizabeth.;

  • 作者單位

    University of California, Irvine.;

  • 授予單位 University of California, Irvine.;
  • 學科 Language Rhetoric and Composition.;Sociology Social Structure and Development.
  • 學位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2008
  • 頁碼 218 p.
  • 總頁數(shù) 218
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文語種 eng
  • 中圖分類
  • 關(guān)鍵詞

相似文獻

  • 外文文獻
  • 中文文獻
  • 專利
獲取原文

客服郵箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公網(wǎng)安備：11010802029741號 ICP備案號：京ICP備15016152號-6 六維聯(lián)合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司?版權(quán)所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服務號